<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for hb's web dev blog</title>
	<link>http://www.xhbml.com</link>
	<description>A web development blog centering around Python, CSS and related subjects.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on A cache module for python CGI scripts by Php Web Page Hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/43#comment-1132</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/43#comment-1132</guid>
					<description>found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later ..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Learning Common Lisp by using it for shell scripting by Wahoo</title>
		<link>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/37#comment-1107</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 05:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/37#comment-1107</guid>
					<description>Thank you for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Learning Common Lisp by using it for shell scripting by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/37#comment-1106</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 02:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/37#comment-1106</guid>
					<description>I couldn't understand some parts of this article Learning Common Lisp by using it for shell scripting, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article Learning Common Lisp by using it for shell scripting, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Learning Common Lisp by using it for shell scripting by hb</title>
		<link>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/37#comment-1067</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/37#comment-1067</guid>
					<description>Nice tip! I wouldn't be surprised if there is something similar for Clisp but SBCL should work for shell scripting too. I will try to test this sometime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice tip! I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if there is something similar for Clisp but SBCL should work for shell scripting too. I will try to test this sometime soon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Learning Common Lisp by using it for shell scripting by Nick Mudge</title>
		<link>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/37#comment-1066</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/37#comment-1066</guid>
					<description>I wish there was a way to not have to comment out the shebang with clisp. I think there might be a way with SBCL: http://www.sbcl.org/manual/Unix_002dstyle-Command-Line-Protocol.html#Unix_002dstyle-Command-Line-Protocol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish there was a way to not have to comment out the shebang with clisp. I think there might be a way with SBCL: <a href="http://www.sbcl.org/manual/Unix_002dstyle-Command-Line-Protocol.html#Unix_002dstyle-Command-Line-Protocol" rel="nofollow">http://www.sbcl.org/manual/Unix_002dstyle-Command-Line-Protocol.html#Unix_002dstyle-Command-Line-Protocol</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Opera 8 and the future of SVG by hb</title>
		<link>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/29#comment-746</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/29#comment-746</guid>
					<description>Yeah, maybe they will try to make SVG/Flash more compatible. That would be nice. It's just that I think it's easier for Adobe/Macromedia to make money on Flash than on SVG as long as they control Flash and it has the biggest market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, maybe they will try to make SVG/Flash more compatible. That would be nice. It&#8217;s just that I think it&#8217;s easier for Adobe/Macromedia to make money on Flash than on SVG as long as they control Flash and it has the biggest market share.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Opera 8 and the future of SVG by Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/29#comment-741</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/29#comment-741</guid>
					<description>I've seen hints that they might bring Flash content into PDF (though that could just be blind speculation). I don't see why they wouldn't share some technology between Flash and SVG. At the least they could do an import/export option (for a common subset of the features). One thing to remember is that Adobe is the buyer, so it's up to them which technology  (or combination of technologies) is pushed in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen hints that they might bring Flash content into PDF (though that could just be blind speculation). I don&#8217;t see why they wouldn&#8217;t share some technology between Flash and SVG. At the least they could do an import/export option (for a common subset of the features). One thing to remember is that Adobe is the buyer, so it&#8217;s up to them which technology  (or combination of technologies) is pushed in the future.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exploring the depths of Sourceforge, Python projects by hb</title>
		<link>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/12#comment-248</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/12#comment-248</guid>
					<description>Finally a non-spam comment! Cool! Maybe I'll dig even deeper one day to do a followup to this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally a non-spam comment! Cool! Maybe I&#8217;ll dig even deeper one day to do a followup to this post.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Exploring the depths of Sourceforge, Python projects by John P. Speno</title>
		<link>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/12#comment-247</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 01:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xhbml.com/archives/12#comment-247</guid>
					<description>I'm ready to see more. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m ready to see more. Thanks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
